Legal Risks of Entering PHI into Public AI Tools

Introduction

As AI tools proliferate in healthcare settings, many clinicians may be tempted to use conversational or generative AI platforms — for example, to summarize chart notes, draft patient communications, or translate clinical documentation.

But when a clinician enters Protected Health Information (PHI) into a public-facing AI system (one not built or contracted for healthcare/compliance use), serious legal and regulatory risks emerge.

This article explores those risks, explains how they arise under HIPAA and related laws, and offers guidance on how to avoid them.

What Happens When PHI Goes Into a Public AI Tool

When a clinician pastes or types identifiable patient data (names, dates of birth, admission/discharge dates, diagnoses, identifiers) into a public AI tool (such as a consumer version of a large-language model), several things may occur:

The data leaves the protected environment of the health system and is transmitted to external servers — potentially subject to different jurisdictional, contractual, or data-retention policies. (Source: USC Price, The HIPAA Journal)
The external tool may store, process, or reuse that data for model training, improvement, or other purposes — something the health system (and patient) did not authorize. (Source: Giva Inc.)
The clinician and/or the covered entity may become the subject of a HIPAA violation or reportable breach if the use or disclosure of PHI is not in conformity with HIPAA's requirements. (Source: The HIPAA Journal)
Even if no "hack" occurs, voluntarily inputting PHI into an unapproved AI tool may itself trigger compliance risk — such as lack of a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) or a vendor that does not meet HIPAA safeguards. (Source: BioMechanics)

Legal Framework & How It Applies

HIPAA Privacy & Security Rules

Under HIPAA's Privacy Rule, a covered entity must ensure that uses and disclosures of PHI are permitted (for treatment, payment, or operations, or with valid authorization). (Source: Houston Journal of Health Law & Policy)
Under the Security Rule, the covered entity must ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of electronic PHI (ePHI) and protect against unauthorized uses or disclosures. (Source: McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC)
Using a public AI tool that lacks proper safeguards (such as a BAA) may violate the minimum necessary standard or constitute an unauthorized disclosure. (Source: The HIPAA Journal)

Business Associate Agreements (BAAs)

Most public AI platforms are not willing to sign BAAs with healthcare entities.
If PHI is transferred to such a platform, the hospital or provider is effectively working with an unapproved vendor, outside HIPAA's legal structure. (Source: HIPAA Times)
Without a valid BAA, the organization cannot transfer liability appropriately — and the vendor has fewer obligations to safeguard the data.

Minimum Necessary, Purpose Limitation & Data Use

HIPAA requires PHI use and disclosure to be limited to the minimum necessary for the intended purpose. (Source: Houston Journal of Health Law & Policy)
If a clinician sends full identifiable records to an AI tool "for help writing a summary," that may exceed minimum necessary and fall outside permitted purposes.
Furthermore, AI tools may repurpose or retain data, violating the intended use limitation.

Breach Notification and Enforcement Risk

If the AI tool retains or exposes PHI — for example, through a breach or unauthorized use — that may constitute a "breach of unsecured PHI" under HIPAA's Breach Notification Rule. (Source: Houston Journal of Health Law & Policy)
Enforcement actions by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) may include audits, fines, corrective action plans, and reputational harm. (Source: McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC)

Real-World Scenario

Imagine a hospitalist pastes this text into a public AI chatbot:

"John Doe (DOB 04/18/1982) was admitted 06/12/2025 with NSTEMI, underwent PCI; please summarize and draft discharge summary."

By doing so, the clinician:

Potentially disclosed identifiable patient data to a third-party system lacking a BAA.
Transferred PHI outside the covered entity's secure environment and audit trail.
Created the risk of unauthorized use, retention, or exposure of that PHI.
Triggered HIPAA breach notification requirements once the incident was discovered — exposing both the provider and the hospital to regulatory penalties.

Why This Matters for Healthcare Compliance Training

Many clinicians assume an AI tool is "safe" if it looks professional, but the vendor may retain data or lack HIPAA compliance entirely.

Training should teach:

What not to share: Never input PHI or identifiable details into public or unapproved AI tools.
How to evaluate tools: Does it have a BAA? Does it store or train on data? Is it approved by the organization?
Annual reinforcement: AI compliance should be integrated with HIPAA, cybersecurity, and ethics training — because AI is now part of everyday healthcare workflow.
Ongoing auditing: Hospitals must monitor AI tool use, maintain logs, and restrict PHI entry into non-compliant systems.

Key Takeaways

Entering PHI into a public or consumer AI tool can trigger a HIPAA violation, even if done unintentionally.
Legal risks stem from lack of safeguards, unauthorized disclosure, and data retention outside hospital control.
Healthcare organizations must ensure any AI tool that touches PHI is HIPAA-compliant — with contracts, secure architecture, and audit trails.
The best prevention is education: every staff member must know what counts as PHI, how to vet AI tools, and when to avoid public systems entirely.

Hi AI helps hospitals prevent these risks through dedicated AI Safety & Compliance Training, giving healthcare workers the knowledge to protect patient data, maintain compliance, and use AI responsibly.

Healthcare AI Insights

Why Healthcare Workers Are Held to a Higher Standard — and How Reckless AI Use Can Lead to Massive Fines

Why Isn't AI Compliance Training Mandatory Yet?

How AI Is Already Embedded Into Electronic Medical Record Workflows

The Rising Imperative for AI Compliance in the Healthcare Workforce

How Patients Really Feel About Their Healthcare Team Using AI